Tata Bahasa Kasus Fillmore Dalam Cerpen Al-Yatîm Oleh Fatima Mohsen: Tata Bahasa Kasus Fillmore Dalam Cerpen Al-Yatîm Oleh Fatima Mohsen

Penulis

Nety Novita Hariyani Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malan
Habil Abyad UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Siti Zulfa Hidayatul Maula Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malan
Ni’ma Rofidah Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58194/eloquence.v1i3.357

Kata Kunci:

Case Grammar; Fillmore; Modality; Prepositio; Al-Yatîm

Abstrak

Tata bahasa kasus muncul seiring dengan tanggapan Fillmore terhadap perkembangan tata bahasa transformasi, yang mana hal ini telâh menjadi subjek yang menarik bagi para ahli sintaksis dan semantik dalâm berapa dekade. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengungkap modalitas dalâm cerpen Al-Yatîm karya Fatima Mohsen; dan (2) untuk mendeskripsikan proposisi dalâm cerpen Al-Yatîm karya Fatima Mohsen berdasarkan teori tata bahasa kasus Charles J Fillmore. Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian deskriptif-kualitatif. Sumber data primer yang digunakan adalâh kutipan-kutipan dalâm cerpen Al-Yatîm karya Fatima Mohsen, dan sumber data sekunder yang digunakan adalâh buku-buku dan jurnal yang berkaitan dengan kajian penelitian. Teknik pengumpulan data dalâm penelitian ini adalâh teknik baca-catat. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalâh analisis data Miles dan Huberman. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini, di antaranya: (1) terdapat 5 jenis modalitas, yaitu waktu (madhi, hal, mustaqbal), tanda (janib madhi, janib hal, janib mustaqbal), negasi (lâ, lâysa, lan), adbverbia (taroddad, darojah), dan mood (irsyadiyah); dan (2) terdapat 8 jenis kasus proposisi, yaitu kasus agentif (dhomir ana, dhomir mustatir nahnu, waliid, wahiid, at-tiflu as-shoghir), kasus eksperiens (tahmilu), kasus instrumen (jihaz), kasus objektif (zaujatahu, kalâmaha), kasus sumber (ta’uda, i’adah, ajro’), kasus tujuan (ilâ at-thobib, ilâ al-mabna), kasus lokatif (ma’mal, daaril aytam, maktabil mudiroh), dan kasus waktu (tsalâsatu asyhur, at-tsanawatil khoms).

Referensi

U. Yuwono and M. R. M. T. Lauder, Pesona bahasa: langkah awal memahami linguistik. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2005.

A. Basid and D. L. Maghfiroh, “Case Grammar in the Movie ‘The Gentlemen’ Based on the Perspective of Charles J. Fillmore,” Seloka J. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 77–87, 2021, doi: doi.org/10.15294/seloka. v10i1.45491.

L. A. Michaelis and A. M. Hsiao, “Verbing and Linguistic Innovation,” Front. Commun., vol. 6, no. July, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.604763.

A. Basid, A. Z. Arzaqi, and A. M. Afiyanto, “Case grammar in film ‘the Professor and the Madman’ based on Charles J. Fillmore’s Perspective,” Kembara J. Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 34–52, 2021.

S. Almeida and I. Ulloa, “A conceptual approach to the -inG construction: Aspects of radiality and subjectification,” Ilha do Desterro, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 443–457, 2020, doi: 10.5007/2175-8026.2020v73n1p443.

J. Dronina, U. Samukaite-Bubniene, and A. Ramanavicius, “Towards application of CRISPR-Cas12a in the design of modern viral DNA detection tools (Review),” J. Nanobiotechnology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01246-7.

P. Duff, Case study research in applied linguistics. Routledge, 2018.

J. van Rijt, P. de Swart, and P. A. Coppen, “Linguistic concepts in L1 grammar education: a systematic literature review,” Res. Pap. Educ., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 621–648, 2019, doi: 10.1080/02671522.2018.1493742.

S. Rachayon, “A Language Teacher in the ESP Classroom: Can We be a Successful Dweller in This Strange and Uncharted Land?,” English Lang. Teach., vol. 13, no. 9, p. 119, 2020, doi: 10.5539/elt.v13n9p119.

M. C. de Marneffe, C. D. Manning, J. Nivre, and D. Zeman, “Universal dependencies,” Comput. Linguist., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 255–308, 2021, doi: 10.1162/COLI_a_00402.

M. Alm, J. Behr, and K. Fischer, “Modal particles and sentence type restrictions: A construction grammar perspective,” Glossa, vol. 3, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.5334/gjgl.702.

A. M. Morgan and V. S. Ferreira, “Beyond input: Language learners produce novel relative clause types without exposure.,” J. Cogn. Psychol., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 483–517, 2021, doi: 10.1080/20445911.2021.1928678.

E. W. Schneider, “All Things New in Singapore: On creativity, complexity, and usage associations in Englishes,” English Today, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.1017/S0266078421000262.

A. Basid and D. L. Maghfiroh, “Case Grammar in the Movie ‘The Gentlemen’ Based on the Perspective of Charles J. Fillmore,” Seloka J. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 77–87, 2021, doi: doi.org/ 10.15294/seloka. v10i1.45491.

B. K. R. Park and Y. C. Kim, “Effort estimation approach through extracting use cases via informal requirement specifications,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 9, 2020, doi: 10.3390/app10093044.

A. HERLAMBANG, “Kasus dalam Cerita Anak Nahru az-Zahabi Karya Ya’qub asy-Syaruni: Analisis Tata Bahasa Kasus Fillmore 1971.” Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2019.

Z. Zakariyah, U. Fauziyah, and M. M. Nur Kholis, “Strengthening the Value of Religious Moderation in Islamic Boarding Schools,” Tafkir Interdiscip. J. Islam. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 20–39, 2022, doi: 10.31538/tijie.v3i1.104.

N. M. Milati, “Application of Picture Media to Improve Students’ English Present Continuous Tense Speaking Ability,” J. Pendidik. Bhs. Ingg. undiksha, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 333, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jpbi.v9i3.44416.

H. Soyama, M. Miyamoto, M. Takano, and K. Furuya, “Response to correspondence ‘Prophylactic use of Bakri balloon for placenta previa surgery: A simple procedure to prevent balloon prolapse,’” Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 58, no. 3, p. 440, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.02.008.

A. T. Hasibuan, N. Simangunsong, E. Rahmawati, and R. Rahmaini, “Humanization of Education in the Challenges and Opportunities of the Disruption Era at Nahdlatul Ulama Elementary School,” Al Ibtida J. Pendidik. Guru MI, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 264, 2020, doi: 10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v7i2.6832.

M. . Ramadahan and Irwanto, “Using Virtual Labs To Enhance Students’ Thinking Abilities, Skills, and Scientific Attitudes,” Int. Conf. Educ. Res. Innov. (ICERI 2017), no. Iceri, pp. 494–499, 2018.

N. Maulidah and F. Wulandari, “Literature Study: Improving Understanding of Science Concepts Using Science Comics for Elementary School Students,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 80, 2021, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v7i1.509.

N. Rohmah Muktiani, E. Listyarini, M. Saryono, and S. Nopembri, “Instructional Model of Self-defense Lesson in Physical Education: A systematic Review,” vol. 278, no. YISHPESS, pp. 66–69, 2019, doi: 10.2991/yishpess-cois-18.2018.16.

M. T. Eser and M. Yurtçu, “A Review of Meta-Analysis Articles in Educational Sciences Conducted Between 2010 and 2019 in Turkey,” Int. J. Progress. Educ., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 15–32, 2020, doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.280.2.

A. Basid, H. I. Kamil, and M. Innah, “Struktur Kalimat pada Film Knives Out Berdasarkan Perspektif Tata Bahasa Kasus Charles J. Fillmore,” Diglosia J. Kaji. Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 301–320, 2021, doi: 10.30872/diglosia.v4i3.209.

I. A. Sag, “Idiomaticity and regularity in grammatical constructions : What can we learn from the clause-linking construct-i-con ? Seiko Fujii ( The University of Toyo ),” vol. 2022, no. 3, pp. 3–4, 2022.

م. عبدالمجيد منصور محمد, “The Structure of Thematic Roles and Text Organization in Quranic Arabic,” المجلة العلمیة لکلیة الآداب-جامعة أسیوط, vol. 21, no. 67, pp. 59–112, 2018, doi: 10.21608/aakj.2018.164839.

E. Paper, “A Case for Generative Linguistics in New Testament Exegesis,” 2022.

A. Carisio, “The Linguistic Image of the World and Image Schemas: an attempt at their delimitation and comparison,” Complut. J. English Stud., vol. 28, no. Langacker 1987, pp. 207–216, 2020, doi: 10.5209/cjes.67041.

Zhukovska V. V., “Current Schools Of Construction Grammar: Theoretical And Methodological Architecture,” Сучасна філологічна наука актуальні питання та вектори розвитку, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 88–100, 2557.