Fillmore’s Case Grammar in the Short Story Al-Yatîm By Fatima Mohsen: Tata Bahasa Kasus Fillmore Dalam Cerpen Al-Yatîm Oleh Fatima Mohsen

Nety Novita  Hariyani; Ni’ma  Rofidah; Habil Abyad; Siti Zulfa Hidayatul Maula

doi:10.58194/eloquence.v1i3.357

Authors

Nety Novita Hariyani Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malan
Ni’ma Rofidah Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malan
Habil Abyad UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Siti Zulfa Hidayatul Maulâ Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58194/eloquence.v1i3.357

Keywords:

Case Grammar, Fillmore, Modality, Preposition, Al-Yatîm

Abstract

Background: Case grammar emerged with Fillmore's response to developments in transformation grammar, which has been an interesting subject to syntacticians and semanticists for many decades.

Purpose: This study aims to (1) reveal the modalities in the short story Al-Yatîm by Fatima Mohsen; and (2) to describe the propositions in the short story Al-Yatîm by Fatima Mohsen based on the grammar theory of Charles J Fillmore's case.

Method: This research includes descriptive-qualitative research. The primary data sources used are quotations from the short story Al-Yatîm by Fatima Mohsen, and the secondary data sources used are books and journals relâted to research studies. The data collection technique in this study was the note-reading technique. The data analysis technique used is Miles and Huberman's data analysis

Results and Discussion: The results of this study include: (1) there are 5 types of modality, namely time (madhi, hal, mustaqbal), sign (janib madhi, janib haal, janib mustaqbal), negation (lâ, lâysa, lan), adverb (taroddad, darojah), and mood (irsyadiyah); and (2) there are 8 types of propositional cases, namely agentive case (dhomir ana, dhomir mustatir nahnu, waliid, wahiid, at-tiflu as-shoghir), experiential case (tahmilu), instrument case (jihaz), objective case (zaujatahu, kalâmaha), source case (ta'uda, i'adah, ajro'), purpose case (ilâ at-thobib, ilâ al-mabna), locative case (ma'mal, daaril aytam, maktabil mudiroh), and time case (tsalâsatu asyhur, at-tsanawatil khoms).

Conclusions and Implications: Case grammar studies not only focus on English grammar, but can also be applied to all grammatical languages including Arabic. In the grammar of the Fillmore case, each case has a semantic role in the sentence aiming to exp lâ in the relâtionship between the predicate and the noun phrase. With this research, readers are expected to be able to understand the grammar of cases, and be able to apply it in the learning process. Relâted to the suggestion that needs to be looked at for future researchers is to examine more references and other theories related to case grammar, as well as be better prepared in the process of data analysis so that they can get good research results. In addition, researchers understand that this study is far from perfect. Therefore, researchers ask for constructive advice from readers so that in the future they can present better research or other written works.

References

P. Hanks and S. Može, “The way to analyse ‘way’: A case study in word-specific local grammar,” Int. J. Lexicogr., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 247–269, Sep. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecz005

H. S. Nst, “An Implemantation of Case Grammar in Teaching English Vocabullary,” J. Educ., vol. 04, no. 04, pp. 1357–1371, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/758

M. Muhajir, “Tata Bahasa Sebagai Cerminan Nilai Ideologis Wacana Politik Perempuan dalam ‘Kolom Perempuan’: Kajian Analisis Wacana Kritis Atas Teks di Harian Suara Merdeka,” Tamaddun J. Kebud. dan Sastra Islam, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 64–82, Jul. 2018, https://doi.org/10.19109/tamaddun.v18i1.2316

D. Darwin, M. Anwar, and M. Munir, “Paradigma Strukturalisme Bahasa: Fonologi, Morfologi, Sintaksis, dan Semantik,” J. Ilm. Semant., vol. 2, no. 02, Feb. 2021, https://doi.org/10.46772/semantika.v2i02.383

I. Susiawati, A. Wildan, and D. Mardani, “Studi Tekstologi pada Wacana Kritis Teun A. Van Dijk dan Robert Hodge,” J. Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 3(2), 524–532, 2022, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3114

N. A. Agustina and Bidari, “Analisis Kesalahan Makna Pada Terjemahan (Arab-Indonesia) Santriwati Kelas III Reguler a TMI Al-Amien Prenduan Sumenep,” Al-Ibrah, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.stital.ac.id/index.php/alibrah/article/view/116

A. Ramadlon, H. Busri, and Z. Elmubarok, “Mubtada’ (Topic) dan Khabar (Comment) dalam Kitab Safinatun Naja Karya Syeikh Salim Bin Abdullah Bin Said Bin Sumair Al Hadramiy (Analisis Sintaksis),” Lisanul Arab J. Arab. Learn. Teach., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 80–88, Nov. 2021, https://dx.doi.org/10.15294/la.v10i2.51939

I. Susiawati, A. Wildan, and D. Mardani, “Studi Tekstologi pada Wacana Kritis Teun A. Van Dijk dan Robert Hodge,” J. Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 6665–6678, May 2022, https://dx.doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3114

A. Royani and E. Mahyudin, “Kajian Linguistik Bahasa Arab,” 2020.

Z. Zuhron, “Frasa Kata Depan dan Strategi Enerjemahannya ke dalam Bahasa Inggris,” Pujangga, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 114, Jun. 2022, https://dx.doi.org/10.47313/pujangga.v8i1.1695

M. Yahya, A. -, and K. Saddhono, “Hubungan Penguasaan Kosakata dengan Kesalahan Diksi dalam Kalimat Bahasa Indonesia Mahasiswa BIPA Level Akademik,” KREDO J. Ilm. Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 1, no. 2, Apr. 2018, https://dx.doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v1i2.2121

A. Rifa’i, “Kajian Filosofi Pendekatan Komunikatif dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab,” Revorma J. Pendidik. dan Pemikir., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 60–74, Nov. 2021, https://dx.doi.org/10.62825/revorma.v1i1.1

Irawati, Gusnawaty, Tadjuddin Maknun, Muhammad Hasyim, and Asriani Abbas, “Analisis Sirkumstan dalam Teks Terjemahan dengan Pendekatan Sistemic Functional Linguistics (SFL),” J. Onoma Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 436–455, Oct. 2022, https://dx.doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v8i2.1771

A. Y. Samu, “Fungsi Sintaktis dan Peran Semantis Argumen Inti Bahasa Manggarai Dialek Manggarai Tengah,” Linguist. Indones., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 186–204, Feb. 2019, https://dx.doi.org/10.26499/li.v36i2.83

K. Khamimah, N. A. Amrullah, and A. S. Arifin, “Analisis Sintaksis Kontrastif Nomina dalam Bahasa Arab dan Bahasa Indonesia,” Lisanul Arab J. Arab. Learn. Teach., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 22–35, Dec. 2022, https://dx.doi.org/10.15294/la.v11i2.61015

N. R. D. Aprila and N. Fauziyah, “Makna Gramatikal pada Slogan Detergen Daia : Kajian Semantik ( Gramatical Meaning of Slogan Daia ’ s Detergent : Semantic Study ),” Semin. Nas. LPPM UMMAT, vol. 1, pp. 334–345, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/semnaslppm/article/view/9670/5037

S. Nafinuddin, “Pengantar semantik (pengertian, hakikat, jenis),” Pengantar Semat., pp. 1–21, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/b8ws3

M. Ritonga, “Kritik terhadap Pendekatan Linguis dalam Mengkaji Makna al-Tadhad,” J. Kaji. dan Pengemb. Umat, vol. 3, no. 1, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/ummatanwasathan/article/view/1960

A. K. Ulfah et al., Ragam Analisis Data Penelitian (Sastra, Riset dan Pengembangan). IAIN Madura Press, 2022.

S. Dwiraharjo, “Kritik Retoris: Suatu upaya Memahami Teks Alkitab dari Sudut Latar Belakang Retorika,” Kurios, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 271, Nov. 2020, https://doi.org/10.30995/kur.v6i2.218

S. Patimah, “Dosen dan Literasi Publikasi, Sub Judul: Manajemen Mutu Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi di Era Industri 4.0.,” 2019, Ideas Publishing, Kota Gorontalo.

I. Marzuki et al., Filsafat Ilmu Di Era Milenial, vol. 1. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/btak4.

K. Kuswara and Y. Sumayana, “Apresiasi Cerita Rakyat sebagai Upaya Memperkuat Karakter Siswa dalam Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 317–326, Dec. 2020, https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.678

T. R. Pangaribuan, S. Siagian, and R. Mursid, “Kemampuan Menulis Teks Naratif Studi Kasus Korelasi Kecerdasan Emosional Dan Berpikir Kreatif Dengan Kemampuan Menulis Narasi,” J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 208, 2019, https://doi.org/10.24114/jtp.v11i2.12586

R. Darmawan, “Lanskap Linguistis di Destinasi Wisata Danau Toba,” Disertasi, no. July, pp. 1–410, 2019.

A. A. Cadavero, N. C. Sharts-Hopko, and B. B. Granger, “Nurse Graduates’ Perceived Educational Needs After the Death of a Patient: A Descriptive Qualitative Research Study,” J. Contin. Educ. Nurs., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 267–273, Jun. 2020, https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20200514-06

S. Shorey, E. Ang, E. D. Ng, J. Yap, L. S. T. Lau, and C. K. Chui, “Communication skills training using virtual reality: A descriptive qualitative study,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 94, p. 104592, Nov. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104592

S. Shorey, A. L. Siew, and E. Ang, “Experiences of nursing undergraduates on a redesigned blended communication module: A descriptive qualitative study,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 61, pp. 77–82, Feb. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.012

F. Ferri Susanto, “An Analysis Of Disfluencies For Describing Phenomena In Spontaneous Speech,” At- Ta’lim J. Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 35–66, Jan. 2022, https://doi.org/10.55210/attalim.v8i1.726

S. Karahan, A. Erbas, and Z. Tuncbilek, “Experiences, Difficulties, and Coping Methods of Burn Nurses: An Exploratory-Descriptive Qualitative Study,” J. Burn Care Res., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1277–1285, Nov. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irac019