The Effect of Storytelling Method on Students’ Reading Comprehension: Pengaruh Metode Bercerita terhadap Pemahaman Membaca Siswa

Nurwahidah; Suratman; Muhammad Yani

doi:10.58194/eloquence.v5i2.3763

Authors

Nurwahidah STKIP Taman Siswa Bima
Suratman STKIP Taman Siswa Bima
Muhammad Yani STKIP Taman Siswa Bima

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58194/eloquence.v5i2.3763

Keywords:

Storytelling, Teaching Method, Reading Comprehension, Narrative Text, English as a Foreign Language (EFL)

Abstract

Background: Students at State Junior High School (SMPN) 4 Monta experience difficulties in reading comprehension, particularly in identifying main ideas, understanding supporting details, following sequences, and drawing conclusions. Limited vocabulary, low interest in reading, and passive participation may contribute to these difficulties.

Purpose: This study examined the effectiveness of the storytelling method in improving students’ reading comprehension at State Junior High School (SMPN) 4 Monta.

Method: This quantitative study employed a true experimental design with a pre-test and post-test control group design. The participants were 43 eighth-grade students, consisting of 23 students in the experimental group and 20 students in the control group. The experimental group received storytelling instruction using narrative texts, while the control group received conventional instruction. Data were collected through reading comprehension tests and analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Shapiro–Wilk normality test, Levene’s test of homogeneity, a baseline equivalence test, paired-samples t-tests, an independent-samples t-test, and Cohen’s d effect size.

Results and Discussion: The experimental group’s mean score increased from 52.74 to 82.13, while the control group’s mean score increased from 49.95 to 63.40. The independent-samples t-test showed a statistically significant difference between the groups, t(41) = −7.406, p < 0.001, with an absolute mean difference of 18.730 points and a large effect size (d = 2.26). These findings indicate that storytelling produced greater improvement in reading comprehension than conventional instruction. The narrative structure and contextualized presentation of vocabulary may have supported students in organizing information, activating prior knowledge, and constructing meaning from narrative texts.

Conclusions and Implications: The findings demonstrate that storytelling significantly improved students’ reading comprehension and produced greater gains than conventional instruction. Storytelling may therefore be considered an alternative instructional strategy for teaching narrative texts in EFL classrooms, particularly at the junior high school level. Future studies should involve larger and more diverse samples, longer treatment periods, different educational contexts, and various text types to further examine the effectiveness and applicability of storytelling in English language learning.

References

[1] A. B. Ostojić, “Reading Comprehension Processes : A Review Based On Theoretical Models And Research Methodology,” 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.31299/hrri.59.1.8

[2] R. Smith, P. Snow, T. Serry, and L. Hammond, “The Role of Background Knowledge in Reading Comprehension: A Critical Review,” Read. Psychol., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 214–240, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348

[3] Rahmat Sapaat Siregar, “Students’ Preferences for Varied Learning Methods: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness and Appeal of Diverse Instructional Approaches Rahmat Sapaat Siregar *, Mandailing Global Edukasia, Indonesia,” 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.62945/jpgi.v1i2.679

[4] A. Saad, “Exploring the Relationship between Teacher-student Interaction Patterns and Language Learning Outcomes in TESOL Classrooms,” JELTAL, pp. 25–34, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2023.5.3.3

[5] D. McDonald, Y. Holmes, and T. Prater, “The Rules of Engagement: A Test of Instructor Inputs and Student Learning Outcomes in Active versus Passive Learning Environments,” J. Bus. Educ. Scholarsh. Teach., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 25–39, 2020.

[6] P. A. Opdal, “To Do or To Listen ? Student Active Learning vs . the Lecture,” Stud. Philos. Educ., no. 1, pp. 71–89, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-021-09796-3

[7] S. Banoth and U. Muthyala, “Using Digital Storytelling as a Tool to Enhance Vocabulary for Young Learners,” J. English Appl. Linguist., vol. 4, no. 1, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.59588/2961-3094.1182

[8] I. Yulianawati, K. Nurhadi, and aresta dian mayasari, “Elementary Students Reading Engagement: the Impact of Story-Telling in EFL Reading Comprehension,” Riwayat Educ. J. Hist. Humanit., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 159–167, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v5i1.27726

[9] N. Nicoli, K. Henriksen, and M. Komodromos, “Investigating digital storytelling for the creation of positively engaging digital content,” 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-03-2021-0036

[10] A. Insuasty Cárdenas, “Enhancing Reading Comprehension through an Intensive Reading Approach,” How, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 69–82, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.19183/how.27.1.518

[11] S. Arifin, “The Role of Critical Reading to Promote Students’ Critical Thinking and Reading Comprehension,” J. Pendidik. dan Pengajaran, vol. 53, no. 3, p. 318, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v53i3.29210

[12] A. Malmir and A. Derakhshan, “The socio-pragmatic, lexico-grammatical, and cognitive strategies in l2 pragmatic comprehension: The case of iranian male vs. female efl learners,” Iran. J. Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.30466/IJLTR.2020.120805.

[13] M. A. Rusgandi and U. Negeri, “R eading Strategies in Enhancing Students ’ Reading Comprehension : Are They Still Relevant ?,” no. 1, pp. 57–72, 2023. https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2023.12.1.57-72

[14] A. Chrisbianto Sachran and N. Aeni, “Student Difficulties on Reading Comprehension in Explanation Text at Eleventh Grade Students of MAN 1 Makassar,” J. Excell. English Lang. Educ., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 423–433, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.26858/joeele.v1i4,%20October.37961.

[15] D. Liu, “The effects of segmentation on cognitive load , vocabulary learning and retention , and reading comprehension in a multimedia learning environment,” pp. 1–12, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01489-5

[16] E. Kikas, G. Silinskas, K. Mädamürk, and P. Soodla, “Effects of Prior Knowledge on Comprehending Text About Learning Strategies,” Front. Educ., vol. 6, no. October, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.766589

[17] S. Bakkaloğlu and G. Pİlten, “Examining the Relationship Between Reading Motivation and Reading Comprehension Self-Efficacy Perception,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 144–158, 2025. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2023.10.1.909

[18] H. S. Rad, “Reinforcing L2 reading comprehension through artificial intelligence intervention : refining engagement to foster self ‑ regulated learning,” Smart Learn. Environ., 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00377-2

[19] E. S. Id, J. Stalnaker, A. Hubbard, C. H. Hafen, and E. G. B. Id, “To participate or not to participate ? A qualitative investigation of students ’ complex motivations for verbal classroom participation,” PLoS One, pp. 1–22, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297771

[20] D. EFRIZA, D. DESWARNI, and M. SEPYANDA, “What Can Reading Motivation D o for Improving Student ’ s Reading Comprehension ? Implications for Reading Instruction in the School,” ENGLISH Fr., no. March 2016, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v7i1.4344

[21] Z. I. FRANKO, “Integrating Storytelling In English Language Teaching : Enhancing Young Learners ’ Engagement And Comprehension Traditional offers In education , Stephen Krashen ’ s Input Hypothesis aligns storytelling with,” Candidate Pedagog. Sci., vol. 1, no. 120, pp. 0–3, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.35433/pedagogy.1(120).2025.18

[22] Y. Zhang, “Use of Schema Theory in the Teaching of Reading Comprehension,” pp. 138–147, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.63313/ESW.9068

[23] C. Qatrinada and tri wintolo apoko, “Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr Hamka Revised: 7,” vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 62–74, 2024.

[24] Sugiyono, Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. CV Bandung, 2023.

[25] M. Ahmad and S. Wilkins, “Purposive Sampling in Qualitative Research : A Framework for the Entire Journey,” pp. 1–19, 2024.

[26] K. M. Campus, “KMC Journal,” vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 87–105.

[27] T. Pamungkas, R. K. Nisya, P. Asteka, and I. S. Rahmawati, “Random Drawing Strategies in Procedural Text Learning,” vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 52–58. https://doi.org/10.31949/jell.v9i1.13973

[28] M. Macken-horarik, “A PPRAISAL and the special instructiveness of narrative,” vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.012

[29] D. Sukenti, N. S. Idris, C. J. Bonk, and B. Joshua, “Development of assessment rubric for writing narrative texts in madrasa : The implementation of the Bloom taxonomy,” vol. 1, pp. 87–104, 2025. https://doi.org/10.63826/jiire.v1i2.172

[30] V. Bežilová, Enhancing Efl Vocabulary Acquisition Through Storytelling. 2024.

[31] R. A. Salsabilla, “Improving Students ’ Reading Comprehension Through Context Clues Strategies Improving Students ’ Reading Comprehension Through Context Clues Strategies,” 2024.