The Effectiveness of the As-Sahlah Textbook in Improving Arabic Language Proficiency among Students of the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business: Efektivitas Buku Teks As-Sahlah dalam Meningkatkan Kemahiran Bahasa Arab di Kalangan Mahasiswa FEBI

Agus Khamid; Muhandis Azzuhri; Muhammad Ulil Fahmi

doi:10.58194/eloquence.v5i1.3411

Authors

Agus Khamid Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
Muhandis Azzuhri Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan, Indonesia
Muhammad Ulil Fahmi Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58194/eloquence.v5i1.3411

Keywords:

Effectiveness, As-Sahlah Textbook, Arabic Languages, FEBI, Mixed Methods

Abstract

Background: Arabic language proficiency is a fundamental requirement for students of Islamic Economics and Business, as it enables access to primary Sharia sources, comprehension of Islamic economic literature, and mastery of professional terminology used in Sharia-based financial and business practices.

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of the As-Sahlah textbook in improving the Arabic language proficiency of students at the Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business (FEBI).

Method: This research adopted a mixed-methods approach with a sequential explanatory design, in which quantitative data collection and analysis preceded qualitative inquiry. Quantitative data were obtained through pretest–posttest assessments and perception questionnaires administered to 30 FEBI students enrolled in an Arabic for Economics course. The instruments were designed to measure learning outcomes, perceived effectiveness, ease of use, relevance, and learning motivation. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews and classroom observations to capture students’ learning experiences and engagement during the instructional process. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and gain score analysis, while qualitative data were examined using the interactive analysis model of Miles and Huberman, supported by source and method triangulation to ensure credibility.

Results and Discussion: The results lead to that the use of the As-Sahlah textbook leads to measurable improvements in students’ Arabic proficiency, particularly in vocabulary mastery and comprehension of Islamic economic texts. Students also reported increased motivation, clearer understanding of Sharia-based business contexts, and greater perceived relevance of Arabic learning to their field of study. This study makes a novel contribution by integrating quantitative learning outcome data with qualitative insights to explain how contextualized materials facilitate learning transfer in Arabic for Specific Purposes.

Conclusions and Implications: The study concludes that the use of the As-Sahlah textbook is associated with improvements in students’ Arabic proficiency, as reflected in the increase from a mean pretest score of 79.39 to a mean posttest score of 84.68, resulting in a score gain of 5.29. The findings suggest that context-based Arabic textbooks should be further developed and adopted, and future research should explore digital enrichment and larger samples to strengthen Arabic for Specific Purposes (ASP) pedagogy in Islamic higher education.

References

[1] W. B. Hallaq, An Introduction to Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801044

[2] T. Kuran, Islam and Mammon: The Economic Predicaments of Islamism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400837359

[3] D. Dudley-Evans and M. St John, Developments in English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

[4] H. Richards and T. Rodgers, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024532

[5] J. S. Bruner, The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028999

[6] D. Nunan, Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667336

[7] R. Ellis, The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

[8] Z. Dörnyei, Motivation in Second Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

[9] A. Cunningsworth, Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann, 1995.

[10] B. Tomlinson, Developing Materials for Language Teaching, 3rd ed. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.

[11] B. Tomlinson, “Materials evaluation,” in Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

[12] J. Flowerdew and L. Peacock, Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524766

[13] M. Widdowson, Explorations in Applied Linguistics 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.4000/apliut.3747

[14] R. Ellis, Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.65961/AJELT-2003-1-009

[15] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2014.

[16] J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2018.

[17] A. Al-Batal, Arabic for Professional Purposes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2017.

[18] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2022.

[19] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2018.

[20] J. W. Creswell, Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 5th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2015.

[21] A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1998.

[22] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.

[23] L. R. Gay, G. E. Mills, and P. Airasian, Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications, 10th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2012.

[24] R. R. Hake, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64–74, 1998. doi: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

[25] N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2018.

[26] D. Brinton, M. Snow, and M. Wesche, Content-Based Second Language Instruction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 1989.

[27] J. Crandall and D. Kaufman, Content-Based Instruction in Higher Education Settings. Alexandria, VA: TESOL, 2002.

[28] H. D. Brown, Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, 4th ed. White Plains, NY: Pearson, 2015.

[29] S. D. Krashen, Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982.

[30] D. Nunan, Language Teaching Methodology. London: Prentice Hall, 1991.

[31] B. Tomlinson, Materials Development in Language Teaching, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

[32] R. Ellis, Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

[33] J. Cenoz, “Content-based instruction and CLIL,” Language Teaching, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2015.https://eric.ed.gov/?redir=http%3a%2f%2fdx.doi.org%2f10.1080%2f07908318.2014.1000922

[34] M. Knowles, The Adult Learner, 6th ed. Burlington, MA: Elsevier, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080481913

[35] J. Harmer, How to Teach English, 2nd ed. Harlow: Longman, 2007.

[36] P. Nation and I. S. P. Nation, Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858656

[37] J. Scrivener, Learning Teaching, 3rd ed. London: Macmillan, 2011.

[38] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.

[39] D. R. Sadler, “Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems,” Instructional Science, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 119–144, 1989, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714

[40] A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193

[41] Z. Dörnyei, The Psychology of the Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005.

[42] H. D. Brown, Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 6th ed. White Plains, NY: Pearson, 2014.

[43] R. Ellis, Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118271643

[44] A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1997.

[45] B. J. Zimmerman, “Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 82–91, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

[46] J. Bruner, Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966.

[47] F. Makalunsenge, M. A. Samad, and A. Abdullah, “Improving the Ability of Maharah Qiraah Class VII Through Busy Book Learning Media,” Eloquence: Journal of Foreign Language, vol. 3, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.58194/eloquence.v3i3.2306.