EVALUASI SISTEM PENILAIAN HASIL BELAJAR PADA KURIKULUM MERDEKA PADA MATA PELAJARAN BAHASA INGGRIS SD

Novri Pahrizal; Reko Hari Putra; Lian Gafar Otaya

doi:10.58176/edu.v5i1.2997

Authors

Novri Pahrizal IAIN Kerinci
Reko Hari Putra IAIN Kerinci
Lian Gafar Otaya Institute Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58176/edu.v5i1.2997

Keywords:

Evaluasi, Penilaian Hasil Belajar, Kurikulum Merdeka

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the assessment system implemented by English teachers at an elementary school in Sungai Penuh City using the Countenance Stake evaluation model. This study combines a quantitative approach to measure the effectiveness of teacher assessments according to certain standards. The sample was taken through purposive sampling, involving five English teachers from one representative school. The research instrument, a questionnaire compiled based on Minister of Education and Culture Regulations Number 23 of 2016 and Number 21 of 2022, measured aspects of planning, implementation, and follow-up in the assessment. The evaluation results indicate that at the planning stage of the assessment, teachers have met the basic standards, but need improvement in the formulation of assessment guidelines and the development of instruments such as quizzes and oral tests. In implementation, the assessment criteria achieved a good category (68.00), especially in the use of multiple-choice tests, behavioral observations, and group assignments. However, revisions are needed in the assessment of skills and attitudes, as well as in paying attention to students' honesty and punctuality when submitting assignments. At the follow-up stage, the assessment conducted was also categorized as good, with an achievement of 17.60. Teachers have implemented a remedial program and are willing to hold additional sessions for students who need it. However, teachers still do not provide enough enrichment to students who have achieved competency, so that their role in helping friends who have not achieved competency can be increased.

References

Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman teoritis praktisi pendidikan.

Azizah, S., Khairat, A., Barroso, U., & Maja, G. (2023). Implications of the implementation of the independent curriculum for the development of students' talents and interests. Lingeduca: J. of Language and Education Studies, 2(3), 187-195. https://doi.org/10.55849/lingeduca.v2i3.311

Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (Edisi IV). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Brookhart, S. M. (2018). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Čepić, R., & Papak, P. P. (2021). Challenges of curriculum planning and achieving learning outcomes: A case study of Croatian elementary school teachers' experiences. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(3), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.3/456

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285961

Fan, X. (2022). Teachers' perspectives on the evaluation of teacher effectiveness: A focus on student learning objectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103635

Habók, A. and Magyar, A. (2018). The effect of language learning strategies on proficiency, attitudes and school achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02358

Hasyim, R., Akib, R., Penggu, E., Jusriati, J., & Nahdawati, N. (2022). Students’ strategies in english learning at home during the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics (Ijeal), 2(3), 445-452. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijeal.v2i3.1809

Jaiswal, P. and Al-Hattami, A. (2020). Enhancing learners’ academic performances using student centered approaches. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Ijet), 15(16), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i16.14875

Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model asesmen autentik untuk menilai hasil belajar siswa sekolah menengah pertama (SMP): Implementasi asesmen autentik di SMP. Jurnal penelitian dan evaluasi pendidikan, 20(2), 131–141.

Kemendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Nomor 23, Tahun 2016, tentang Standar Penilaian.

Longchamp, J. C. (2017). The effect of student learning objectives on teachers and teaching as part of the teacher evaluation process: A grounded theory study. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika, 45.

Maryansyah, Y., Hamzah, S., & Hadiwinarto, H. (2023). An evaluation on toefl workshop program using stake's countenance model. Exposure Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 12(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v12i1.9723

Masruraini, M., Rasyid, M., & Mania, S. (2023). Evaluation of character education strengthening program through scouts extra in kksc (kisada kids scout camp) activities using countenance evaluation at mis ushuluddin singkawang. International Journal of Multi Discipline Science (Ij-Mds), 6(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.26737/ij-mds.v6i2.4700

Menteri Pendidikan, K. R. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2022 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menegah. Indonesia

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Permana, L., Kurniawati, S., & Kinanti, H. (2023). An evaluation of implementation of mbkm program using countenance stake evaluation model.. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.24-11-2022.2332587

Qutoshi, S. and Poudel, T. (2014). Student centered approach to teaching: what does it mean for the stakeholders of a community school in karachi, pakistan?. Journal of Education and Research, 4(1), 24-38. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v4i1.9620

Rahman, M. (2023). Effects of student-centered learning and formative assessment on first year students of a non-government college in bangladesh. Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v3i2.251

Ramadhan, I. (2023). Independent curriculum assessment at MA Negeri 2 Pontianak. Jurnal Scientia, 12(04), 767–775.

Rohaenah, I. N., & Hasanah, A. (2021). DEVELOPMENT OF CHARACTER EDUCATION MODELS. IJGIE (International Journal of Graduate of Islamic Education), 2(1), 22-39.

Santosa, I., Iskandar, I., & Munawaroh, L. (2024). Assessing students’ learning readiness toward student-centered learning. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 8(1), 254-268. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.8.1.254-268

Stake, R. E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers college record, 68(7), 1–15.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Wardani, N., Suwandi, S., Ulya, C., & Setiyoningsih, T. (2023). Differences in learning indonesian literature in the 2013 curriculum and the independence curriculum in junior high schools in indonesia. Kne Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i18.14322

Webber, K. (2011). The use of learner-centered assessment in us colleges and universities. Research in Higher Education, 53(2), 201-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9245-0

ZAFA, N. ‘AFIFAH, ILZAMUDIN, I., & PERDANA, P. R. . (2024). Analysis of Student Learning Readiness to Fulfil Achievements Independent Curriculum with Differentiated Learning. LEARNING : Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(4), 992-998. https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v4i4.3452