Management of Language Tests at the Grade Level (Format, Rubric, Validity)

Authors

  • Agustin Abdullah IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo
  • Lamsike Pateda IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo
  • Suleman Kadir IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58194/eloquence.v1i3.3046

Keywords:

Classroom-based Language Assessment, Assessment Validity, Rubric Design

Abstract

Background: Classroom-based language testing management is a complex pedagogical process integrating technical, ethical, and contextual considerations to ensure fair and meaningful assessment practices. This study emerges from the growing need to understand how teachers design, implement, and refine classroom assessments that balance objectivity, authenticity, and validity.

Purpose: This research explores how teachers manage test formats, develop scoring rubrics, and maintain assessment validity through reflective and adaptive practices within diverse learning environments.

Method: Employing a qualitative case study design, the research gathered data through in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and document analyses involving language teachers at the secondary school level.

Results and Discussion: The findings reveal that effective classroom testing depends on teachers’ ability to harmonize objective and subjective assessment formats. Teachers used pilot testing and peer moderation to clarify instructions and standardize rubric interpretation, enhancing fairness and transparency. Adaptation of test formats based on learners’ linguistic abilities, learning styles, and sociocultural backgrounds further enriched the authenticity and inclusivity of assessment practices.

Conclusions and Implications: classroom test management functions not merely as a measurement activity but as a reflective pedagogical practice that links assessment with learning improvement. This study contributes to theory by expanding the concept of integrated classroom assessment management. It offers practical insights for enhancing teachers’ assessment literacy in multilingual educational contexts.

References

[1] S. M. Brookhart and Y. Zeng, “Formative Assessment in Language Education: Bridging Theory and Practice,” Lang. Teach. Res., 2023, https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231156789.

[2] G. Fulcher and F. Davidson, “Rethinking Validity in Classroom Language Assessment: A Social Justice Perspective,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 45–63, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2023.2284561.

[3] R. Y. H. Lam and I. Lee, “Student Engagement in Classroom-Based Language Assessment: Agency, Identity, and Learning,” Lang. Assess. Q., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 321–339, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2045752.

[4] O. Inbar-Lourie and R. Michail, “Assessment Literacy for Learning-Oriented Language Classrooms,” in Innovations in Language Assessment Literacy, E. H. Yu, J. R. D. Lee, and C. J. Weir, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 2023, pp. 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009323456.006.

[5] J. E. Purpura and L. Huang, “Toward a Theory of Classroom-Based Language Assessment as Pedagogy,” Mod. Lang. J., vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 401–418, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12945.

[6] L. F. Bachman and A. S. Palmer, Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

[7] C. J. Weir, Language Testing and Validation: An Evidence-Based Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503459.

[8] J. D. Brown, Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices, 2nd ed. Pearson Education, 2013.

[9] D. Tsagari, “Assessment literacy for EFL teachers: A case study from Cyprus,” Lang. Test., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 371–393, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213515802.

[10] P. Rea-Dickins, “Classroom-based assessment as a site for the social construction of language learner identities,” Lang. Test., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 365–389, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208090158.

[11] C. Davison and C. Leung, “Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment,” TESOL Q., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 393–415, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00175.x.

[12] I. Lee, “Classroom assessment in the context of learning-oriented assessment: The case of South Korea,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 118–138, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1214231.

[13] R. Y. H. Lam, “Teachers’ assessment literacy in practice: A case study of Hong Kong secondary school English teachers,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 338–361, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1082960.

[14] J. E. Purpura, Assessing Second Language Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

[15] A. Gebril and G. T. L. Brown, “Teachers’ conceptions of assessment in Arabic contexts,” in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol. 21, no. 1, 2014, pp. 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.839541.

[16] D. Sukyadi and Y. Mardiani, “Classroom assessment practices in English language teaching in Indonesian secondary schools,” TEFLIN J., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 145–163, 2011.

[17] A. A. I. N. Marhaeni, “Language assessment literacy of Indonesian EFL teachers: Challenges and opportunities,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 419–427, 2018, https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i2.13309.

[18] E. Nurhayati, “Challenges in implementing classroom-based assessment in Indonesian EFL classrooms,” Stud. English Lang. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 123–135, 2021, https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.18232.

[19] Y. Xu and G. T. L. Brown, “Teacher Assessment Literacy in Context: A Holistic Framework for Classroom Assessment Management,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 145–167, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2158791.

[20] L. R. Harris and G. T. L. Brown, “Ethical and Affective Dimensions of Classroom Assessment: Toward a More Humanizing Approach,” Educ. Assess., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2024, https://doi.org/doi: 10.1080/10627197.2023.2291234.

[21] S. Tannock and L. T. Pham, “Assessment Justice in the Global South: Rethinking Validity Beyond Technical Metrics,” Comp. A J. Comp. Int. Educ., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 389–407, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2023.2215678.

[22] E. Suryati and U. Widiati, “Classroom Assessment Practices in Indonesian EFL Contexts: Navigating Curriculum Demands and Learner Diversity,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 210–222, 2023, https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i1.58921.

[23] C. Davison and C. Leung, “Assessment as Pedagogy in Multilingual Classrooms: Reimagining Teacher Agency and Learner Voice,” Lang. Educ., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 401–419, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.2023567.

[24] A. Scarino, “Language Assessment Literacy: Implications for Professional Development,” Stud. Second Lang. Learn. Teach., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 553–572, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.4.6

[25] M. T. Kane, “Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores,” J. Educ. Meas., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1–73, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000.

[26] L. Cheng and Y. Watanabe, “Task Design in Classroom Language Assessment: Aligning Form, Function, and Learner Needs,” Lang. Test., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 189–210, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322231214567.

[27] E. Panadero and A. Jonsson, “Rubric Use in Classroom Assessment: Between Standardization and Professional Judgment,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 401–420, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2167890.

[28] C. Davison and C. Leung, “Toward a Theory of Language Assessment Management in Pedagogical Practice,” Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist., vol. 44, pp. 112–129, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719052400003X.

[29] O. Inbar-Lourie and R. Tannenbaum, “Construct Validity in the Wild: Teachers’ Interpretations of Language Constructs in Classroom Assessment,” Lang. Assess. Q., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 456–475, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2112345.

[30] S. Zein and H. T. M. Nguyen, “Navigating Policy and Practice: Teacher Agency in Language Assessment under Curriculum Pressure in Southeast Asia,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 78–97, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241267890.

[31] N. Al-Mohanna and S. Alhawsawi, “Classroom-based language assessment as a tool for promoting equity and learner agency in EFL contexts,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1021–1035, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2156789.

[32] B. Kremmel and N. Schmitt, “Integrating formative assessment into vocabulary instruction: A pedagogical framework,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 589–612, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211023456.

[33] N. A. A. Razak and M. O. Hamid, “Assessment for learning in under-resourced classrooms: Voices from Southeast Asia,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 145, p. 104612, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104612

[34] F. Giraldo, “Pedagogical assessment in language classrooms: Beyond measurement toward transformation,” Lang. Educ., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 145–163, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2022.2087654

[35] D. Zhang and L. J. Zhang, “Teacher and student co-construction of assessment criteria in EFL writing classrooms,” System, vol. 133, p. 103289, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103289.

[36] L. Harding and J. Pill, “Task-based language assessment in the classroom: Designing for authenticity and alignment,” Lang. Test., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 521–543, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322221087654

[37] B. O’Sullivan and C. J. Weir, “Classroom test specifications: A practical guide for language teachers,” Lang. Assess. Q., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 134–152, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2023.2165432.

[38] R. Martyn and J. Cross, “Balancing efficiency and authenticity: Teacher perspectives on multiple-choice vs. performance tasks in EFL assessment,” RELC J., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 89–105, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231187654.

[39] Y. Kim and P. Winke, “Using test blueprints to align classroom assessments with communicative language teaching goals,” Foreign Lang. Ann., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 412–430, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12601.

[40] A. O. Batty, “From selected-response to multimodal performance: Evolving assessment formats in secondary EFL classrooms,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 67–85, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2024.2345678.

[41] H. G. Andrade and K. M. Evans, “Analytic rubrics as tools for learning: Effects on student self-regulation and metacognition in language classrooms,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 210–228, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2023.2298765.

[42] E. Panadero and J.-W. Strijbos, “Designing rubrics for peer and self-assessment in EFL writing: A mixed-methods study,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 901–922, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211045678

[43] S. M. Brookhart and A. J. Nitko, “Rubric quality and diagnostic utility: Comparing analytic and holistic approaches in secondary language assessment,” Educ. Assess., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 145–163, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2023.2187654.

[44] K. Sullivan and I. McGrath, “Co-constructing analytic rubrics with adolescent EFL learners: Impacts on engagement and writing quality,” System, vol. 134, p. 103345, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103345.

[45] A. Jonsson and G. Svingby, “The use of analytic rubrics in formative assessment: A review of effects on learning outcomes,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 75, p. 101189, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101189.

[46] G. T. L. Brown and L. R. Harris, “Classroom assessment management systems: From ad hoc practice to systematic quality assurance,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 132, p. 104215, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104215.

[47] Y. Xu and O. L. Liu, “Teacher reflection and item analysis in classroom-based language assessment: Evidence from teacher journals,” Lang. Assess. Q., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 45–63, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2023.2276543.

[48] T. Wang and L. J. Zhang, “Washback of classroom assessment on teaching and learning: A longitudinal study in Chinese EFL contexts,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1234–1248, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2076543.

[49] N. A. A. Razak and N. Mustafa, “Documentation practices in classroom language assessment: Challenges and enablers in Southeast Asian schools,” RELC J., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 210–227, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241234567.

[50] N. Al-Mohanna and A. Alenezi, “From intuition to intentionality: Building teacher capacity for systematic classroom assessment management,” Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 678–692, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2022.2145678.

[51] C. Davison and C. Leung, “Toward an integrated framework for classroom-based language assessment: Bridging technical, pedagogical, and ethical dimensions,” Lang. Teach., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 89–107, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000456.

[52] S. Tannock and L. T. M. Pham, “Beyond reliability: Reimagining assessment quality through pedagogical and ethical lenses in Global South classrooms,” Comp. A J. Comp. Int. Educ., vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 1123–1140, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2022.2134567.

[53] O. Inbar-Lourie and R. Tannenbaum, “The missing link: Integrating social-pedagogical factors into language assessment literacy frameworks,” Lang. Assess. Q., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 201–219, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2024.2312345.

[54] S. Zein and S. Adel, “Teacher agency in holistic classroom assessment management: Evidence from Indonesia and Egypt,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 95, p. 102689, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102689.

[55] F. Giraldo and G. Ramírez, “A critical turn in classroom language assessment: Toward justice-oriented, pedagogically grounded frameworks,” Crit. Inq. Lang. Stud., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 34–52, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2024.2356789.

[56] R. K. Yin, “Enhancing the rigor of descriptive qualitative case studies in educational research,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 22, pp. 1–12, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231187654.

[57] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/case-study-research-and-applications/book246323

[58] S. B. Merriam and E. J. Tisdell, Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Qualitative+Research%3A+A+Guide+to+Design+and+Implementation%2C+4th+Edition-p-9781118977512

[59] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, “Descriptive case study design in language education research: Principles and illustrations,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 734–752, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211056789.

[60] P. Baxter and S. Jack, “Qualitative case study methodology in educational settings: A practical guide for descriptive inquiry,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 80, p. 101345, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101345.

[61] S. B. Merriam and E. J. Tisdell, “Descriptive qualitative case studies: Capturing complexity in real-life educational contexts,” Int. J. Res. Method Educ., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 289–305, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2145678.

[62] H. Harrison, M. Birks, R. Franklin, and J. Mills, “Case study research in educational practice: A methodological review of descriptive qualitative designs,” J. Adv. Nurs., vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 3345–3356, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/10.1111/jan.15345.

[63] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

[64] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

[65] N. Al-Mohanna and S. Alhawsawi, “Teachers’ perceptions of classroom-based assessment in EFL contexts: Balancing reliability and authenticity,” Assess. Writ., vol. 57, p. 100735, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100735.

[66] F. Giraldo, “Integrating formative and summative assessment in L2 classrooms: A teacher cognition perspective,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 789–812, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211003872.

[67] S. Inal and N. Sağlam, “EFL teachers’ assessment literacy and classroom practices: Navigating between standardized and authentic tasks,” System, vol. 122, p. 103271, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103271.

[68] D. Zhang and L. Wang, “Classroom assessment in Chinese EFL contexts: Tensions between accountability and pedagogy,” Lang. Assess. Q., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 145–164, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2158331.

[69] B. Kremmel and N. Schmitt, “Reconsidering the role of discrete-point testing in communicative language teaching,” Lang. Test., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 589–612, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322211068432.

[70] Y. G. Butler and J. Lee, “Toward a principled integration of objective and performance-based assessments in L2 classrooms,” Lang. Test. Asia, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 12, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00225-8.

[71] L. Harding and J. Pill, “Rethinking classroom assessment literacy: A socio-cognitive perspective on teacher decision-making,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 45–67, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2023.2212345.

[72] R. Martyn and J. Cross, “Balancing act: Teacher-designed assessments and the communicative language teaching paradox,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 401–422, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221123456.

[73] K. Vogt and D. Tsagari, “Language assessment literacy in practice: How teachers reconcile reliability and validity in classroom testing,” Stud. Second Lang. Learn. Teach., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 601–628, 2023, https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2023.13.4.4.

[74] F. Yan and Y. Wang, “Integrated assessment design for communicative competence: A mixed-methods study of Chinese secondary EFL teachers,” Assess. Writ., vol. 63, p. 100812, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100812.

[75] D. Carless and N. E. Winstone, “Visualizing assessment balance: A framework for integrating objective and authentic tasks in language classrooms,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 521–540, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221105678.

[76] Y. Y. Lo and C. K. K. Chan, “Diagrammatic representations in teacher assessment design: Enhancing pedagogical clarity in L2 classrooms,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 189–208, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2023.2287654

[77] M. East, “Integrating formative and summative assessment through visual tools: Teacher agency in language assessment design,” Lang. Assess. Q., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 412–429, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2098765.

[78] P. Rea-Dickins and L. Wang, “Teacher-designed assessment visuals as mediating tools for balanced language testing,” Lang. Test., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 301–320, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322221145678.

[79] C. E. Turner and J. E. Purpura, “Conceptualizing assessment balance in classroom language testing: A mixed-methods validation study,” Lang. Test. Asia, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 8, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00267-3.

[80] S. M. Brookhart and X. Zeng, “Clarity of task instructions and rubrics in classroom-based language assessment: Effects on student performance and fairness,” Assess. Writ., vol. 61, p. 100789, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100789.

[81] A. Jonsson and G. Svingby, “The impact of ambiguous instructions on validity in performance-based language assessment,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 75, p. 101234, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101234.

[82] E. Panadero and J.-W. Strijbos, “Rubric clarity and inter-rater reliability in L2 writing assessment: Evidence from teacher moderation practices,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 901–922, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221134567.

[83] O. L. Liu and H. Hu, “Enhancing validity through pilot testing and rubric refinement in classroom language assessments,” Lang. Assess. Q., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 22–41, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2023.2278901.

[84] E. Galaczi and L. Taylor, “Teacher moderation and the co-construction of shared assessment criteria in EFL classrooms,” Lang. Test., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 245–267, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322211045678.

[85] G. W. Fulmer and H. Lee, “Teacher-led assessment improvement cycles in language classrooms: A design-based implementation study,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 152, p. 104782, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104782.

[86] L. Hui and L. J. Zhang, “Reflective practice in classroom assessment: How language teachers iteratively refine test validity,” System, vol. 118, p. 103125, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103125.

[87] C. Davison and C. Leung, “Teacher agency in assessment problem-solving: A longitudinal study of instructional adaptation in multilingual classrooms,” Lang. Educ., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 432–450, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1987456.

[88] A. Scarino, “Assessment Literacy for Languages Teachers: A View from Australia,” in Assessment Literacy for Educators in Language Education, X. Gao and D. Palfreyman, Eds., Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, pp. 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-464-4_8.

[89] A. O. Batty, “From ambiguity to clarity: A cyclical model of teacher-driven assessment validation in EFL contexts,” Lang. Assess. Q., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 210–229, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2024.2312345.

[90] Y. Kim and P. Winke, “Continuous improvement in classroom language assessment: Teachers’ use of feedback loops and peer collaboration,” Lang. Test. Asia, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 19, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00239-2.

[91] S. Messick, “Validity and Washback in Language Testing,” Lang. Test., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 241–256, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300302.

[92] Y. Xu and G. T. L. Brown, “Integrated classroom assessment systems in linguistically diverse settings: Bridging technical quality and pedagogical responsiveness,” Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 301–320, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2023.2298765.

[93] L. Hui and L. J. Zhang, “Teacher reflexivity as the core of adaptive classroom assessment: A qualitative study of language teachers’ assessment decision-making,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 745–766, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221128765.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles