Critical Discourse Analysis of Media Power in Reporting the 19% US Tariff on Indonesian Exports: A Comparative Study of Indonesian and Middle East News Outlets: Analisis Diskursus Kritis tentang Kekuatan Media dalam Pelaporan Tarif 19% AS atas Ekspor Indonesia: Studi Perbandingan antara Media Indonesia dan Timur Tengah

Hilmy Aqila Sukmono; Abdul Basid

doi:10.58194/eloquence.v4i3.3028

Authors

Hilmy Aqila Sukmono Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
Abdul Basid Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58194/eloquence.v4i3.3028

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, Media Framing, US Tariff, Global Hegemony, Indonesian Exports

Abstract

Background: Media discourse on international trade is not neutral; it reflects ideological positions through language.

Purpose: This study aims to analyze how Indonesian and Middle East media linguistically frame the 19% US tariff on Indonesian exports using Van Dijk’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA).

Method: The research applied a qualitative descriptive design with Van Dijk’s CDA framework. Six online news articles published in July 2025 were purposively selected from major Indonesian (Tempo, Metro TV, The Jakarta Post) and Middle Eastern outlets (Al Jazeera, Sky News Arabia, Al Arabiya) based on relevance to the 19% tariff issue and narrative completeness. Articles were analyzed through Van Dijk’s macro–super–micro structure. Coded independently by two researchers using a shared coding guide before reconciling discrepancies through consensus, ensuring analytic reliability. Cross-checking linguistic patterns, thematic structures, and translations of Arabic texts further strengthened the credibility of the findings.

Results and Discussion: The findings show that the six outlets cannot be classified by region, as their ideological orientations diverge within and across Indonesia and the Middle East. Indonesian media emphasize domestic stakes—technocratic caution, economic vulnerability, or sovereignty-driven critique—while Middle Eastern outlets embed the tariff within global power dynamics, ranging from anti-hegemonic (Al Jazeera) to pro-U.S. (Al Arabiya) or semi-neutral (Sky News Arabia). Across macro, super, and micro levels, ideological positioning arises from institutional agendas rather than geography. Shared strategies—evaluative lexis, power metaphors, and selective sourcing—function as socio-cognitive cues. That shape mental models of hierarchy and inequality, ultimately legitimizing specific interpretations of U.S.–Indonesia trade relations.

Conclusions and Implications: The study shows that ideological framing of the tariff stems from outlet-specific discursive choices rather than regional identity. Language thus helps reproduce global power asymmetries. Future research should expand datasets and integrate socio-cognitive approaches to deepen analysis.

References

[1] Y. Bonaparte, “Tariffs and the Unequal Burden: How Trade Policy Deepens Income Inequality,” SSRN, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5219949

[2] A. Chryssogelos, “Contesting international economic governance: the ‘people’ and trade in the Trump and Brexit rhetoric,” in Contestation and Polarization in Global Governance, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023, pp. 108–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800887268.00012

[3] K. Siddiqui, “Donald Trump’s Tariffs: A Prelude to Global Trade Wars?,” World Financ. Rev., 2025, [Online]. Available: https://worldfinancialreview.com/donald-trumps-tariffs-a-prelude-to-global-trade-wars/

[4] “Indonesia Strikes Deal to Reduce US Tariff to 19%,” Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. Accessed: Aug. 05, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://setkab.go.id/en/indonesia-strikes-deal-to-reduce-us-tariff-to-19/

[5] “Joint Statement on Framework for United States-Indonesia Agreement on Reciprocal Trade,” The White House. Accessed: Aug. 05, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2025/07/joint-statement-on-framework-for-united-states-indonesia-agreement-on-reciprocal-trade/

[6] B. Fernandez, “Uncharted Territory? U.S.-China Power Dynamics in Trump’s Second Presidency.” 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5141226

[7] E. Tower, T. D. Willett, and J. Gilbert, “Mr. Trump’s Tariff War.” 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5351653

[8] K. A. Clausing and M. E. Lovely, “Why Trump’s Tariff Proposals Would Harm Working Americans,” SSRN Electron. J., 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4834397

[9] R. M. Entman, “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm,” J. Commun., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 51–58, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

[10] E. K. G. Mensah, “Assessing the Role of Media Influence and Public Perception in Legal Decision-Making,” SSRN Electron. J., 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4811277

[11] T. A. Van Dijk, “Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis,” in Language & Peace, Routledge, 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203984994

[12] T. A. Van Dijk, “Principles of critical discourse analysis,” Discourse Soc., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 249–283, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006

[13] L. Li and F. Gao, “Contrasting semantic and sentimental features between Chinese and American economic news discourse in the epidemic era: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 100435, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100435

[14] C. Graham and B. K. O’Rourke, “Ideological Presuppositions in Media Coverage of Corporation Tax Policy in the UK and Ireland: A Critical Discourse Analysis,” Am. Behav. Sci., vol. 68, no. 14, pp. 1862–1893, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221144830

[15] C. Linjing, “A Study on the Theoretical Framework of Discourse Analysis of China’s Response to Sino-US Trade Frictions,” Sage Open, vol. 12, no. 1, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221086656

[16] F. Chen and G. Wang, “A war or merely friction? Examining news reports on the current Sino-U.S. trade dispute in The New York Times and China Daily,” Crit. Discourse Stud., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1844252

[17] S. Wu and S. Rungrojsuwan, “A Discourse Analysis of the Wall Street Journal ’s and China Daily ’s News Reports on the Trade War Between the United States and China,” in Proceedings of the 2022 8th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2022), Atlantis Press SARL, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220504.184

[18] X. Tongkai, “A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Reuters’ News Coverage of the 2025 Sino-U.S. Trade War,” Int. Linguist. Res., vol. 8, no. 2, p. p30, May 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.30560/ilr.v8n2p30

[19] L. Zhu, “Framing the political conflict discourse in Chinese media,” J. Lang. Polit., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 867–889, Oct. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21005.zhu

[20] L. Tang, “Othering as mediated soft-power practice: Chinese diplomatic communication of discourse about China-US trade war through the British press,” Discourse, Context Media, vol. 51, p. 100669, Feb. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100669

[21] S. Liu, “Personalization of Trump and Xi in the U.S.–China trade conflict news: Comparison between the U.S. and China,” Int. Commun. Gaz., vol. 86, no. 8, pp. 672–692, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485231206364

[22] S. Liu, M. Boukes, and K. De Swert, “Strategy framing in the international arena: A cross-national comparative content analysis on the China-US trade conflict coverage,” Journalism, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 976–998, May 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211052438

[23] M. Kasim, “Strategic statecraft or symbolic coercion? A comparative study of trump’s tariff doctrine in China and India,” Pacific Rev., pp. 1–31, Nov. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2025.2584182

[24] K. Zeng, R. Wells, J. Gu, and A. Wilkins, “Bilateral Tensions, the Trade War, and US–China Trade Relations,” Bus. Polit., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 399–429, Dec. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2022.8

[25] D. A. Steinberg and Y. Tan, “Public responses to foreign protectionism: Evidence from the US-China trade war,” Rev. Int. Organ., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 145–167, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-022-09468-y

[26] R. Brutger, S. Chaudoin, and M. Kagan, “Trade Wars and Election Interference,” Rev. Int. Organ., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–25, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-022-09464-2

[27] R. Wodak, “Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA,” Discourse Stud., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 179–190, Feb. 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059566

[28] N. Fairclough, S. Pardoe, and B. Szerszynski, “Critical Discourse Analysis and Citizenship,” in Analysing Citizenship Talk: Social positioning in political and legal decision-making processes, H. Hausendorf and A. Bora, Eds., John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006, pp. 98–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.19.09fai

[29] T. A. Van Dijk, “Critical Discourse Analysis,” in The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Wiley, 2015, pp. 466–485. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22

[30] A. U. Abdulkadir, “A critical discourse analysis of selected political interviews in Nigerian news media,” J. Lang. Linguist. Lit. Stud., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 47–61, May 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.57040/jllls.v3i2.432

[31] D. Humaira and A. Basid, “Yahya Sinwar’s Murder in Arabic International Media Platforms: A Norman Fairclough Critical Discourse Analysis,” Eralingua J. Pendidik. Bhs. Asing dan Sastra, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 163, Apr. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v9i1.70496

[32] A. P. Imani and R. Wahyudi, “A critical discourse analysis of media political bias on Marvel’s Sabra controversy,” Englisia J. Lang. Educ. Humanit., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 16, May 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v12i2.23446

[33] H. A. Amaireh, “A Critical Discourse Analysis of Al Jazeera’s Reporting of the 2021 Israel-Palestine Crisis,” Int. J. Arab. Stud., Oct. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v24i1.559

[34] M. M. A. Amer, “BBC and New York Times’ Coverage of the May 2021 Israeli Onslaught on Gaza: A Critical Discourse Analysis,” Int. J. English Linguist., vol. 12, no. 5, p. 1, Jul. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v12n5p1

[35] R. J. Malkawi, S. I. Fareh, and G. Rabab’ah, “Framing the shooting of Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh in English and Arabic news headlines: a critical discourse study,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1276, Sep. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03784-x

[36] T. X. Lan and G. S. Navera, “The slanted beam: A critical discourse analysis of anti-Islam and anti-Muslim discourse in China,” Discourse Soc., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 107–125, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265211048704

[37] K. Li and Q. Zhang, “A corpus-based study of representation of Islam and Muslims in American media: Critical Discourse Analysis Approach,” Int. Commun. Gaz., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 157–180, Mar. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048520987440

[38] D. Fatinova, W. Gunawan, A. R. Saifullah, E. Risnawati, R. J. Emha, and Y. Mubarok, “The Representation of the Indonesian Government in Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Rempang Island Conflict,” J. Lang. Lang. Teach., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 645, Apr. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i2.10926

[39] I. W. Numertayasa, A. Santoso, M. Syahri, and P. Agus Adiwijaya, “A Battle on Social Media: Critical Discourse Analysis of the Sampradaya in Bali,” MANUSYA J. Humanit., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–28, Oct. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-20242711

[40] T. Ran and Z. Liu, “‘The Russia-Ukraine War’ or ‘The US-Russia War’? Thematic analysis of Global Times ’ coverage of the Russia-Ukraine War,” Media Asia, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 3–32, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2023.2246721

[41] B. Ranji and C. Archetti, “The details that matter: Racism in Norwegian media during the Covid-19 pandemic,” Media, Cult. Soc., vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1397–1413, Oct. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437241241482

[42] T. Rouhana, “Critical discourse analysis guided topic modeling: the case of Al-Jazeera Arabic,” Information, Commun. Soc., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 904–922, Apr. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2166364

[43] T. Neilson and K. Heylen, “Journalism unions and digital platform regulation: a critical discourse analysis of submissions to Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code,” Media Int. Aust., vol. 195, no. 1, pp. 106–119, May 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X231176583

[44] X. Yu and H. Zheng, “A Critical Discourse Analysis of Different News Reports on the Same Event: Illustrated with Examples from China Daily and The Guardian,” Open J. Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 348–363, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.1011023

[45] T. A. Van Dijk, “Structures of news in the press,” in Discourse and communication: New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication, T. A. Van Dijk, Ed., De Gruyter, 1985, pp. 69–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852141.69

[46] T. A. van Dijk, “Discourse, Cognition and Society,” Discourse Soc., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 5–6, Jan. 1996, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007001001

[47] B. Hidayat, “Tarif Impor 19 Persen: Make America Great Again,” Tempo. Accessed: Aug. 25, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.tempo.co/prelude/sampul-tempo-negosiasi-tarif-impor-2051463

[48] I. N. Jelita, “Tarif Trump 19% bikin PDB Indonesia bakal minus 0,113%,” MetroTVNews. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.metrotvnews.com/read/NQACYz7x-tarif-trump-19-bikin-pdb-indonesia-bakal-minus-0-113

[49] B. Seow, “Trump says Indonesia to face 19 percent tariff under trade deal,” The Jakarta Post. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.thejakartapost.com/business/2025/07/16/trump-says-indonesia-to-face-19-percent-tariff-under-trade-deal.html

[50] Al Jazeera, “ترامب يفرض رسوما جمركية بنسبة 19% على إندونيسيا.” Accessed: Aug. 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.aljazeera.net/ebusiness/2025/7/16/trump-tariffs-indonesia

[51] SNA Business, “ترامب يعلن عن اتفاق تجاري مع إندونيسيا.” Accessed: Aug. 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.snabusiness.com/article/1808914-ترامب-يعلن-اتفاق-تجاري-إندونيسيا

[52] Al Arabiya, “أميركا تتوصل إلى اتفاق تجاري مع إندونيسيا.” Accessed: Aug. 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.alarabiya.net/aswaq/economy/2025/07/23/اميركا-تتوصل-الى-اتفاق-تجاري-مع-اندونيسيا

[53] T. A. Van Dijk, “On Macrostructures, Mental Models, and Other Inventions: A Brief Personal History of the Kintsch-van Dijk Theory,” in Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch, C. A. Weaver, S. Mannes, and C. R. Fletcher, Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1995, pp. 383–410.

[54] T. A. Van Dijk, Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. London: Routledge, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429025532