An Analysis of Content Validity on English Summative Assessment of Fifth Grade in The First Semester in Merdeka Curriculum

Penulis

  • Ella Aprilia Tiana Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58194/jetli.v3i1.1839

Kata Kunci:

content validity, summative assessment, learning objectives

Abstrak

This paper was qualitative research and used content analysis design. This paper aims to analyze the content validity of English summative assessment and the writer tries to know whether the test items are in line with the learning objectives or not. It will describe the conformity and inconformity of three different English summative assessment from three different schools which already implemented Merdeka curriculum. The writer also tries to compare those three English summative assessments. The result showed that UPT SDN 51 Gresik has 100% valid items, UPT SDN 31 Gresik has 93% valid items, UPT SDN 16 Gresik has 91% valid items. Based on the criteria adopted from Arikunto’s opinion those three assessments have good items. It is better for the teacher before making a test looking at first in the flow of learning objective about the learning objective in every unit, so teacher can make test appropriate with the learning objective.

Referensi

Adha, K. (2014). an Analysis on the Content Validity.

Adiredja, R. K. (2012). Content validity analysis on achievment test at a private islamic junior high school.

Alderson, J., Clapham, C., & Wall, D. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Areta, :, & Dari, W. (2014). an Analysis on the Content Validity of English Summative Test Items At the Even Semester of the Second Grade of Junior High School.

Arikunto, S. (1992). Prosedure penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assesment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. American Psychological Association, 238-247.

Heaton, J. B. (1998). Writing english language test. London: Longman Group, New Edition.

Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for English Teacher. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mary, F., & Sake, S. (1983). Foreign language testing. New York, NY: Regents Publishing.

Nofiyanti. (2011). AN ANALYSIS ON THE CONTENT VALIDITY OF THE SUMMATIVE TEST FOR THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS OF DEPARTMENT Of ENGLISH EDUCATION FACULTY OF TARBIYAH AND TEAHERS ’ TRAINING STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH AN ANALYSIS ON THE CONTENT VALIDITY OF THE SUM.

Nugrahanto, A., Winarsih, D., & Farikah. (2018). The Content VALIDITY OF THE SUMMATIVE TEST ITEMSOF ENGLISH FOR THE TENTH GRADERS OF SMA NEGERI 1 MAGELANG IN THE SCHOOL YEAR 2015/2016. Journal of Research on Applied Linguistics Language and Language Teaching, 1(1), 7–14.

Siddiek, D. A. (2010). The impact of test content validity on language Teaching and learning. 2010.

Sultana, R., Shamim, K. M., Nahar, L., & Hasan, F. (2009). Content validity of written examinations in undergraduate anatomy. Bangladesh: Journal of Anatomy.

Weeden, P., Winter, J., & Broadfoot, P. (2002). Assessment what’s in it for school? London and New York: Routledge Falmer.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2024-03-31

Cara Mengutip

Tiana, E. A. (2024). An Analysis of Content Validity on English Summative Assessment of Fifth Grade in The First Semester in Merdeka Curriculum. Journal of English Teaching and Linguistic Issues (JETLI), 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.58194/jetli.v3i1.1839

Terbitan

Vol 3 No 1 (2024): Journal of English Teaching and Lingustic Issues (JETLI)

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Ella Aprilia Tiana

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Authors who publish in Journal of English Teaching and Linguistic Issues (JETLI) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.