Peer Review Process
Every manuscript submitted to Equivalence: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is first evaluated through an initial screening process conducted by the Editor-in-Chief. At this stage, the Editor-in-Chief has the authority to reject manuscripts that do not align with the aims and scope of the journal.
All submitted manuscripts are subjected to plagiarism screening using Turnitin to ensure originality. Manuscripts that pass this stage will then proceed to a double-blind peer review process, which is conducted to assess the scientific quality, methodological rigor, and contribution of the manuscript to the field of mathematics education. Reviewers are expected to provide constructive and meaningful feedback to help improve the quality of the submitted manuscript.
Based on the recommendations of two independent reviewers, the editorial team will make a final publication decision. The entire review process generally takes approximately two to three months.
The editorial decisions fall into the following four categories:
-
Accepted without revision
The manuscript is accepted for publication in its current form. -
Accepted with minor revision
The manuscript will be published after the author completes the required minor revisions. -
Resubmit for review
The manuscript requires substantial revisions and may be resubmitted for a new review cycle. -
Rejected
The manuscript is declined and may not be resubmitted to Equivalence: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.
All articles published in Equivalence: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika are released under an open-access policy, meaning they are freely and permanently available for reading and downloading by the public.
