Penyerahan Naskah

Panduan Penulis

Peer Review Process

Reviewed manuscripts are original manuscripts that have been selected by editorial board and arranged according to the writing guidelines of Jurnal Dakwatun or Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah. For some manuscripts, reviewing process could be conducted by Reviewers ( the articles will be sent to the peer reviewers to get Single-Blind Peer Review Process). Consideration in determining the reviewers and its number, and the decision whether a manuscript is published or not, is determined by the editorial board based on the assessment and / or input from reviewers. Reviewing process will consider novelty, objectivity, method, scientific impact, conclusion, and references.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Author Guidelines

Jurnal Dakwatun or Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah is a scientific journal published by the Department of Da'wah Management, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Da'wah, Sultan Amai State Islamic Institute, Gorontalo on regularly (March and September). This journal receives manuscripts from field and literature research on the da'wah studies, management science, human resource management, Islamic finance institutional management, Islamic pilgrimage management, religious tourism management, and the dynamics of Islamic management.

Editors invite experts, practitioners and enthusiasts in psychology to write a research article in this journal. Articles should be original, research-based, unpublished and not under review for possible publication in other journals. All submitted papers are subject to review of the editors, editorial board, and blind reviewers. Submissions that violate our guidelines on formatting or length will be rejected without review.

The article has been formatted according to the pattern of writing scientific journal articles. Writing articles follow the rules set out in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Sixth Edition. http://www.apastyle.org/manual/index.aspx

Articles sent to the Editor of Jurnal Dakwatun: Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah via submission Open Journal Systems (OJS) on https://e-journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/dakwatun/

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. Articles are formatted according to the writing pattern of scientific journal. Writing articles follow the rules set out in Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Sixth Edition. http://www.apastyle.org/manual/index.aspx
2. The article is an original work (no plagiarism) and has never been published in a journal printed/online.
Articles for Jurnal Dakwatun: Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah sent to Editors via submission Open Journal Systems (OJS) on https://e-journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/dakwatun/
3. Articles typed in Garamond letters with 1.5 spacing in Microsoft Word format with a page size A4 (210 x 297 mm). The length of the article ranged between 6000-8000 words, or about 20-25 pages, including pictures, graphs, and tables (if any). Articles written in Bahasa Indonesia or English by using the rules of good grammar and correct. Articles in English in general use the past tense.
4. Article is written in Indonesian or English using grammatical rules. In general, English article is in the past tense.
The article is the result of research in various issues in the field of the da'wah studies, management science, human resource management, Islamic finance institutional management, Islamic pilgrimage management, religious tourism management, and the dynamics of Islamic management with various multidimensional perspective and approach.
5. Because of "Blind Review" system, the the author hoped not to includ the name, the name and address of the institution and email address in the cover of article. The author's name, name of the institution, as well as the email address listed at the time of registration on the OJS author. To facilitate the communication should include active mobile number.

STRUCTURE

The content and systematics of articles written using the format presented in a narrative essay in the form of a paragraph, without numbering in front subtitles, and should include these components:

1. The title, provided that: a) The title is the formulation of a brief discussion of content, compact, and clear. May use the title of creative and attract readers (maximum 14 words). b) The title is written in English or Indonesian. c) The title is typed in bold capital letters (capital, bold).
2. Abstract written in English and Indonesian. Abstract is the essence of the subject of the whole article. Abstract written in one paragraph within one space, with a maximum length of 200 words. Abstract presented briefly and clearly, it must contain four (4) elements, namely: Reasons for the selection of topics or the importance of the research topic, the hypothesis, research methods, and a summary of the results. Abstracts must be terminated with a comment about the importance of the results or a brief conclusion.
3. The keyword contains basic words in the study, can be drawn from the research variables, characteristics of the subjects, and the theory of the referenced (minimum three words or combinations of words, written in alphabetical order).
4. Introduction (untitled) contains background of the problems, objectives and benefits of the research, the study of theory, and concludes with the hypothesis (number of pages approximately 20%).
5. The method contains the identification of the variables, the research subjects, research instruments and methods of research including data analysis techniques used (the number of pages approximately 20%).
6. The result shows exposure data analysis, consisted of descriptive statistics, test results of the assumptions and results of hypothesis testing are presented sequentially or integrated (number of pages approximately 20%).
7. Discussion contains an explanation of the results of research associated with the results of previous studies, critically analyzed and linked to relevant recent literature (page number approximately 30-40%).
8. Conclusions and suggestions answers from the research objectives written concise, clear, and compact based on the results of research and discussion (approximately 1 page).
9. Bibliography contains reference sources written alphabetically and chronologically, Referral sources are published literature in last 10 years (especially of the journal). Referral preferred are the primary sources in the form of books, reports (including thesis, dissertation), or research articles in scientific journals and magazines.

The following are examples of bibliography writing:

1. Journal article writing without a Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Finkelstein, D. M., Kubzansky, L. D., & Goodman, E. (2006). Social status, stress, and adolescent smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 678–685.

2. Journal article writing with a Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Julianto, V & Subandi, M.A. (2015). Membaca Al Fatihah reflektif intuitif untuk menurunkan depresi dan meningkatkan imunitas. Jurnal Psikologi, 42(1), 34-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.6941.

3. Article from magazine

Chamberlin, J., Novotney, A., Packard, E., & Price, M. (2008, May). Enhancing worker wellbeing: Occupational health psychologists convene to share their research on work, stress, and health. Monitor on Psychology, 39(5). 2629.

4. Article from online magazine

Clay, R. (2008, June). Science vs. ideology: Psychologists fight back about the misuse of research. Monitor on Psychology, 39(6). Diunduh dari: http://www.apa.org/monitor/ tanggal 10 Agustus 2012.

5. Article from newspaper without writer

Six sites meet for comprehensive antigang initiative conference. (2006, November/December). OJJDP News @ a Glance. Diunduh dari: http://www.ncjrs.gov/htmllojjdp/news_acglance/216684/topstory.htmI tanggal 10 Agustus 2012.

6. Unpublished Thesis or Disertation

Julianto, V. (2013). Pengaruh membaca Al Quran. (Tesis tidak dipublikasikan). Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada,Yogyakarta.

7. Citation from Book

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan skala psikologi (ed.2).Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Shotton, M. A. (1989). Computer addiction? A study of computer dependency. London,England: Taylor & Francis.

8. Citation from Book with Editor

Cone, J. D. (1999). Observational assessment: Measure development and research issues. Dalam P. C. Kendall, J. N. Butcher, & G. N. Holmbeck (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (hlm. 183223).New York: Wiley.

Sutopo, A. S., & Pranajati, R. A. (1993). Mengolah data kuantitatif. Dalam T.D. Hastjarjo & A.F. Helmi (Eds.), Metode Penelitian Psikologi (hlm. 215-235).Yogyakarta: Wijaya Press.

9. Citation from university unpublished

Blackwell, E., & Conrod, P. J. (2003). A five dimensional measure of drinking motives. Naskah tidak dipublikasikan, Department of Psychology,University ofBritish Columbia,Vancouver,Canada.

Nuryati, A., & Indati, A. (1993). Faktor faktor yang memengaruhi prestasi belajar. Naskah tidak dipublikasikan, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Gadjah Mada,Yogyakarta.

10. Manuscript writing from abstact in printed edition

Woolf, N. J., Young, S. L., Fanselow, M. S., & Butcher, L. L. (1991). MAP-2 expression in choliboceptive pyramidal cells of rodent cortex and hippocampus is alterded by Pavlovian conditioning [Abstract]. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 17, 480.

11. Manuscript writing from abstact in electronic edition (online):

Lassen, S. R., Steele, M. M., & Sailor, W. (2006). The relationship of school-wide positive behavior support to academic achievement in an urban middle school [Abstract]. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 701-702. Diunduh dari: http://www.interscience.wiley.com.

12. Citation from the same author and the same year with two books

Azwar, S. (2012a). Penyusunan skala psikologi (ed.2).Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2012b). Reliabilitas dan validitas (ed.4).Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

SUBMISSION PREPARATION CHECKLIST

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

1. The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
2. The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
3. The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
4. The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.
5. If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Publication Ethics

Jurnal Dakwatun is a peer-reviewed journal, published twice a year by the Departement of Da’wah Management, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Da’wah, Sultan Amai State Islamic Institute, Gorontalo. It is available online as open access sources. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor-in-chief, the Editorial Board, the reviewer, and the publisher.

Duties of the Publisher

The publication of an article in Jurnal Dakwatun is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific methods. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the editor, the reviewer, the publisher, and the society. As the publisher of Jurnal MD, Publisher takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and it recognizes its ethical and other responsibilities.

If there is plagiarism and questions about the published article will be discussed and determined by the editorial board and published by the publisher

Each article accepted and published in Jurnal Dakwatun, its grammar and sentences are checked with Grammarly® application and is recommended to use Reference Manager application Mendeley, and Turnitin.

Duties of the Editor

The editor of the Jurnal Dakwatun is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair Play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

Other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate, the Information about a submitted manuscript will not be disclosed to anyone by the editor and any editorial staff.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.