EXPLORING ERRORS IN ENGLISH DESCRIPTIVE WRITING OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS: AN ERROR ANALYSIS STUDY AT SMKN 1 LIMBOTO, GORONTALO

Authors

  • Marwah Mokodompis IAIN Gorontalo
  • Enni Akhmad
  • Nur Wahidah Tayib Pido

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58194/jetli.v5i2.3637

Keywords:

: error analysis; descriptive writing; EFL; surface strategy taxonomy; senior high school

Abstract

This study investigates types and sources of errors in English descriptive writing among tenth-grade students at SMKN 1 Limboto, Gorontalo. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach with Surface Strategy Taxonomy (Dulay, Burt & Krashen, 1982) as the analytical framework, twenty students' descriptive texts were collected and analyzed through Corder's (1967) five-step error analysis procedure. Findings reveal that omission and misformation were the dominant error types, accounting for the highest proportion of total errors. Omission errors primarily involved the copula 'be' and articles, while misformation errors featured incorrect verb forms and inappropriate lexical choices. These errors were predominantly caused by Bahasa Indonesia (L1) interference, intralingual overgeneralization, and limited writing practice opportunities. The study concludes that targeted grammar instruction particularly on copula 'be,' the English article system, and simple present tense morphology  and systematic error-correction feedback are essential for improving EFL descriptive writing competence at the vocational high school level.

 

References

Chaves Varón, A. (2021). The development of writing skills of learners of English as a foreign language. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22489.44643

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(4), 161–170.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Desnaranti, L., & Putra, F. P. (2024). Implementing surface structure taxonomy in analyzing undergraduate students' business e-mail errors. Research and Development Journal of Education, 10(2), 1078–1090. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v10i2.23360

Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. Oxford University Press.

Fadhly, F. Z. (2022). Enhancing the academic writing of EFL learners: An analysis of effective strategies through meta-synthesis. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 6(2), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v6i2.1438

Hafizah, W. (2023). An analysis of student difficulties in writing descriptive text. English Teaching and Linguistics Journal, 4(1), 153–164.

Huan, E. (2022). Omission in writing undergraduate thesis proposals. SPARKLE Journal of Language, Education, and Culture, 1(1), 1–12.

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Kemendikbud. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Capaian pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMK. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Mertosono, S. R., & Erniwati, E. (2023). Error analysis: Types and causes of EFL learners’ errors in writing analytical exposition text. Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra, 7(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v7i1.37875

Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge University Press.

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), 209–231.

Syifa, Q. A., Al-Baekani, A. K., & Srisudarso, M. (2022). Junior high school students’ difficulties in writing descriptive text. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(10), 4470–4474. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i10.1044

Wati, W. K. (2023). Error analysis of students’ sentence structure in paragraph writing at the eleventh grade. Journal of English Education, 4(2), 153–164.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31