Mapping the Evolution of Genre-Based Approaches in Teaching Writing: A Bibliometric Perspective

Authors

  • Azizah Handayani
  • Sri Liliska R. Bau
  • Andiani Nabu IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58194/jetli.v2i2.1828

Keywords:

Genre-based Approach, Teaching Writing, Bibliometrics

Abstract

This study investigates the Genre-Based Approach to Teaching Writing, as reported in English language education journals in Indonesia from 2018 to 2022, based on SINTA rankings 1 to 4. The research predominantly employs qualitative and quantitative methods, with less frequent use of Classroom Action Research (CAR) and Research and Development (R&D) approaches. The review highlights a peak in research activity in 2020, likely due to adaptations required by the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings reveal that the genre-based approach has evolved from a niche method to a mainstream educational strategy, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving students' writing skills through structured genre-specific instruction.  Data collection methods varied across studies, with questionnaires being the most commonly used instrument, supplemented by observation tests and interviews. The research indicates significant improvements in writing abilities, supported by diverse methodological approaches including empirical evidence and iterative improvements. The study provides a comprehensive overview of key research trends, influential publications, and emerging themes, offering valuable insights for educators, researchers, and policymakers. By mapping the development of genre-based approaches, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of its impact on writing education and informs future research directions.

References

J. P. Lantolf and M. E. Poehner, “Sociocultural Theory,” The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2013.

L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. London, England: Harvard University Press, 1978.

A. F. Dabao, “Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom : Comparing group, pair, and individual work,” J. Second Lang. Writ., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 40-58, 2012.

K. McDonough, J. De Vleeschauwer, and W. Crawford, “Comparing the quality of collaborative writing, collaborative prewriting, and individual texts in a Thai EFL context,” System, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 109-120, 2018.

G. Wigglesworth and N. Storch, “Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy,” Lang. Test., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 445-466, 2009.

S. Kang and J.-H. Lee, “Are two heads always better than one ? The e ff ects of collaborative planning on L2 writing in relation to task complexity,” J. Second Lang. Writ., vol. 45, no. 1-2, pp. 61-72, 2019.

K. McDonough, J. De Vleeschaywer, and W. J. Crawford, “Exploring the benefits of collaborative prewriting in a Thai EFL context,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 685-701, 2019.

S. O. Adodo and J. O. Agbayewa, “Effect of homogenous and heterogeneous ability grouping class teaching on student’s interest, attitude and achievement in integrated science,” Int. J. Psychol. Couns., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 48-54, 2011.

J. L. Cady, “The Effects of Implementing Heterogeneous Writing Groups in a Fifth Grade Classroom,” Unpublished thesis. Rowan University, New Jersey., 2011.

P. Maftoon and N. Ghafoori, F, “A comparative study of the effect of homogeneous and heterogeneous collaborative interaction on the development of EFL learners’ writing skill,” J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 127-158, 2009.

I. A. E. M. Mahmoud, “The Effect of Homogeneous Grouping versus Heterogeneous Grouping on High School Students’ EFL Writing Achievement,” Unpublished Thesis. United Arab Emirates University, 2011.

H. Fauziah and M. Latief, “The effect of working in heterogeneous and homogeneous pairs on the students’ writing skill,”

Downloads

Published

2023-07-31

How to Cite

Handayani, A., Bau, S. L. R., & Nabu, A. (2023). Mapping the Evolution of Genre-Based Approaches in Teaching Writing: A Bibliometric Perspective. Journal of English Teaching and Linguistic Issues (JETLI), 2(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.58194/jetli.v2i2.1828