PENGEMBANGAN DAN VALIDASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DIGITAL ADAPTIF BERBASIS AUGMENTED REALITY DAN TPACK UNTUK MENDUKUNG TRANSFORMASI PENDIDIKAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58194/jiemr.v5i2.2619Keywords:
Augmented Reality, Adaptive Learning, TPACK, Digital Transformation, Qualitative Case Study, Gorontalo CityAbstract
This study aims to explore, develop, and validate an adaptive digital learning model based on Augmented Reality (AR) and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) to support educational transformation in Gorontalo City. The study employed a qualitative approach with an exploratory case study design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis involving teachers, students, school principals/managers, and educational technology practitioners selected through purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings identified eight main themes: digital transformation as a change in learning practices, the need for adaptive learning, AR as a visual-interactive medium, AR and TPACK integration, diversity in students’ digital literacy, context-based model validation, implementation barriers, and gradual implementation strategies. The findings indicate that the model should contextually integrate technology, pedagogy, content, student characteristics, and institutional support. The model is recommended to be developed through iterative trials, evaluation, and refinement
References
[1] E. Mukul and G. Büyüközkan, “Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of education 4.0,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 194, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122664.
[2] T. T. Bui and T. S. Nguyen, “The survey of digital transformation in education: A systematic review,” Int. J. TESOL Educ., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 32–51, 2023, doi: 10.54855/ijte.23343.
[3] R. I. Fariani, K. Junus, and H. B. Santoso, “A systematic literature review on personalised learning in the higher education context,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 449–476, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10758-022-09628-4.
[4] I. Yuyun and D. Suherdi, “Components and strategies for personalized learning in higher education: A systematic review,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Asian and Asian-American Studies, 2023. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-054-1_23.
[5] E. du Plooy, D. Casteleijn, and D. Franzsen, “Personalized adaptive learning in higher education: A scoping review of key characteristics and impact on academic performance and engagement,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 21, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39630.
[6] D. Hooshyar, X. Weng, P. J. Sillat, K. Tammets, M. Wang, and R. Hämäläinen, “The effectiveness of personalized technology-enhanced learning in higher education: A meta-analysis with association rule mining,” Comput. Educ., vol. 223, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105169.
[7] K. B. Bayly-Castaneda, M. S. Ramirez-Montoya, and A. Morita-Alexander, “Crafting personalized learning paths with AI for lifelong learning: A systematic literature review,” Front. Educ., vol. 9, 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1424386.
[8] Y. Zhang, “Instructional leadership and teacher development: Evidence from secondary schools,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 89, 2020.
[9] A. Amores-Valencia, D. Burgos, and J. W. Branch-Bedoya, “Influence of motivation and academic performance in the use of Augmented Reality in education: A systematic review,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1011409.
[10] E. L.-C. Law and M. Heintz, “Augmented reality applications for K-12 education: A systematic review from the usability and user experience perspective,” Int. J. Child-Computer Interact., vol. 30, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100321.
[11] A. Hidayat, “Peran Kepala Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran,” J. Manaj. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021.
[12] A. Sakr and T. Abdullah, “Virtual, augmented reality and learning analytics impact on learners, and educators: A systematic review,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, pp. 19913–19962, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12602-5.
[13] K. A. Bölek, G. De Jong, and D. Henssen, “The effectiveness of the use of augmented reality in anatomy education: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94721-4.
[14] T. S. Maulana, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Realitas Tertambah Ar Melalui Pendekatan Tpack Di,” JIEMER, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 65–75, 2025.
[15] M. Bulut and R. Borromeo Ferri, “A systematic literature review on augmented reality in mathematics education,” Eur. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 556–572, 2023.
[16] M. Jibril and N. A. Adedokun-Shittu, “Enhancing education: A comprehensive framework for integrating Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) into teaching and learning,” Indones. J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, 2024.
[17] T. A. Sandy, C. Ismaniati, S. Abbas, and Z. C. A. Dalu, “Research trends based on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Indonesia: A systematic review,” Epistema, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 2023, doi: 10.21831/ep.v4i1.59486.
[18] Á. A. Jiménez Sierra, J. M. Ortega Iglesias, J. Cabero-Almenara, and A. Palacios-Rodríguez, “Development of the teacher’s technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) from the Lesson Study: A systematic review,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1078913.
[19] D. Iskandar, “Integration of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) learning methods in the Learning Management System as an effort to improve educator competence,” JTP—Jurnal Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 24, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.21009/jtp.v24i3.31773.
[20] A. H. Rahayu, A. Widodo, U. S. Saud, and Muslim, “Improving Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) of elementary school teachers through training with a collaborative, practical and reflective approach,” Mimb. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 11, no. 4, 2024.
[21] R. P. Wijaya, Komarudin, and A. Badrujaman, “Digital transformation of education in Indonesia: A conceptual framework for evaluation,” J. Educ. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 10, no. 2, 2026, doi: 10.30983/educative.v10i2.10157.
[22] S. Safitri, A. Cahyadi, and H. Yaqin, “Inovasi dan Difusi Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dalam Manajemen Pendidikan Islam,” Al-Madrasah J. Pendidik. Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 1706, 2023, doi: 10.35931/am.v7i4.2678.
[23] M. C. Akbar and S. Armiyanti, “Character Education in the Digital Era: Overcoming Hate Speech Through Social Media Ethics Awareness Among Students,” Int. J. Econ. Technol. Soc. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 279–287, 2023.
[24] H. Ahaya, I. R. N. Hula, and R. B. H. Bahri, “Penerapan Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) dalam memenuhi kebutuhan Guru Penggerak PAI,” IHSANIKA J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 9–25, 2024, doi: 10.59841/ihsanika.v3i2.2413.
[25] T. S. Maulana, “Pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis realitas tertambah AR melalui pendekatan TPACK di lingkungan pendidikan,” J. Islam. Educ. Manag. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 65–75, 2025, doi: 10.58194/jiemr.v3i2.3401.
[26] D. Burke, H. Crompton, and C. Nickel, “The use of extended reality (XR) in higher education: A systematic review,” TechTrends, vol. 69, pp. 998–1011, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11528-025-01092-y.
[27] H. Balalle, “Learning beyond realities: Exploring virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality in higher education—a systematic literature review,” Discov. Educ., vol. 4, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00559-7.
[28] S. Setiyati, T. Tarman, M. Metta, and W. Warman, “Perencanaan Strategik dalam Membangun Mutu Pendidikan di Madrasah Syaichona Kholil Teluk Pandan,” J. Tarb. Dan Ilmu Kegur. Borneo, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 267–281, 2024.
[29] P. Hallinger and W.-C. Wang, Assessing instructional leadership with the principal instructional management rating scale. Springer, 2021.
[30] N. Alajlani, M. Crabb, and I. Murray, “A systematic review in understanding stakeholders’ role in developing adaptive learning systems,” J. Comput. Educ., vol. 11, pp. 901–920, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40692-023-00283-x.
[31] S. Mtisi, “The qualitative case study research strategy as applied on a rural enterprise development doctoral research project,” Qual. Rep., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 2768–2782, 2022, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5663.
[32] S. in E. Evaluation, “Assessing student learning during simulations in education: Methodological opportunities and challenges when applying a longitudinal case study design,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 72, p. 101129, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101129.
[33] I. de L. González-Salgado, J. Rivera-Navarro, M. Gutiérrez-Sastre, P. Conde, and M. Franco, “Conducting member checking within a qualitative case study on health-related behaviours in a large European city: Appraising interpretations and co-constructing findings,” Health (Irvine. Calif)., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3–21, 2024, doi: 10.1177/13634593221109682.
[34] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches,” Couns. Psychother. Res., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 2021, doi: 10.1002/capr.12360.
[35] D. Byrne, “A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis,” Qual. Quant., vol. 56, pp. 1391–1412, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tri Setiawati Maulana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
