Cultural integration in English material (a study on students’ vocabulary mastery and its effect on communication ability)

Authors

  • Kartin Lihawa UNG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57153/jetli.v2i3.1473

Keywords:

cultural context, learning material, vocabulary, communication ability

Abstract

The objective of this study is to maximize SMA students’ mastery of English vocabulary which is to support and give the best effect on their ability in using English communication. To reach this objective is to treat the three English Department students  of UNG in their English teaching practice based on cultural context of Gorontalo, in terms of improving the SMA students’ speaking ability which supported by their rich vocabularies. The method used in this program is qualitative and the technique to gather the data is observation of the teaching practice. The data derived from the 12 SMA students’ speaking ability to who were observed as they were the leaders of each of 12 groups from the 4 groups in each 3 classes handled by the three English Department students of UNG. The results show that applying cultural context material in teaching English can give positive effect in terms of improving SMA students’ ability in their communication in English.

References

Aceves, T C. and Orosco J. M. 2014. Innovation Configuration Culturally Responsive Teaching. California: Ceedar Document No. IC-2. http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations.

Benson, P. 2001. Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. England: Longman.

Direktorat Risetdan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. Direktorat Jendral Penguatan Riset dan Pengembangan. Kementerian Riset, Teknologi ,dan Pendidikan Tinggi. 2016. Panduan Pelaksanaan Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat di PerguruanTinggi.Edisi x.

Fordham, M. 2015. Educational Traditionalism and the Academic Disciplines: Reviving the Liberal Philosophy of Education. Jonathan Simons and Natasha Porter(Eds). p. 55-63. Knowledge and The Curriculum. A collection of essays to accompany. London: Policy Exchange. www.policyexchange.org.uk

Harmer, J. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching. 3rd Ed. England: Longman.

Hsin, Chia-Lin. Language and Culture in Foreign Language Teaching. Newcastle: Newcastle University. Accessed on Friday 23rdJune 2017.

Nurhadi, B. Y, & Senduk, A. G. 2004. Pembelajaran Kontekstual dan Penerapannya dalam KBK. Malang: UniversitasNegeri Malang.

Oller, J. W. Jr. 1979. Language Tests at School: A Pragmatic Approach. London: Longman Group Limited.

Oura ,Gail K. Authentic Task Based Materials: Bringing the Real World Into the Classroom. Accessed on Friday 23rd June 2017.

Richards, J. C. 2013. Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design. RELC Journal44(1) 5–33© The Author(s) 2013Reprints and permission: sagepub. co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0033688212473293rel.sagepub.com

Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, T. S. 2001. Approach and Teaching Methods in Language Teaching. 2nd Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rubric of Speaking Assessment https://kakaris.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/rubric-of-speaking-assessment/Accessed on 24th Monday, October 2016

Stern, H.H. 1983. Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Lihawa, K. (2023). Cultural integration in English material (a study on students’ vocabulary mastery and its effect on communication ability). Journal of English Teaching and Linguistic Issues (JETLI), 2(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.57153/jetli.v2i3.1473